AFAIK time was given to allocate the packages to authors. I think it's OK to proceed. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 17:26 ShadowKyogre <shadowkyogre.public@gmail.com> wrote:
These were the original uploaded PKGBUILDs, still referencing to a stale source: 1. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg/ 2. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg-phyrexian/
These were the uploads with the new content re-hosting, but the maintainer hasn't contacted me back about wanting to maintain the other MtG templates that're floating around (there's a few more): 1. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/magicseteditor-mtg/ 2. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/magicseteditor-mtg-base/
I was planning to wait until August to make a decision, but, like the title says, I'm not sure whether I should just submit updated packages on the AUR4 that point to the same sources as magicseteditor-mtg, wait for elegua to re-upload the packages for magicseteditor-mtg*, or upload the second set of links and add elegua as a contributor to make sure he still has write rights. I originally orphaned the first two links because I was thinking that elegua might be interested in merging it into the packages he uploaded so there aren't duplicate packages floating around.