24 Feb
2014
24 Feb
'14
4:54 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Jeremy Audet <ichimonji10@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package name proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns.
Excellent point. The principle of least surprise would dictate that packages have obvious names light lightworks or powerdns.
Status? There still are two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks