On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com<daenyth%2Barch@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 13:01, w9ya <w9ya@qrparci.net> wrote:
<snip>
When I voice an opinion I am told I am making "wild claims", yet your
proposal is based on a claim that things "will get out of hand". In 5 years they have not gotten out of hand. IN fact the evidence is that this
entire proposal
is NOT needed at this time becuase there is NO resource issue at this time. <snip> Regards; Bob Finch
Regarding your claim that things have never gotten out of hand: What part of the 29-hour downtime caused by the community repo do you not consider "out of hand"
Out of context. As the "wild claims" I was accused of making related to resource issues. (I.e. Stuff like hardware and so forth) I have never made that claim concerning background coding. Lou and I were speaking about the abuse by the TUs of the repo. Regards; Bob Finch P.S... Adopting your proposal will NOT eliminate that kind of outage either. Just delay it. That is unless we all agree to limit the repo to a particular size. That is NOT part of your proposal as it is currently manifest.