Thorsten Töpper wrote:
Some AUR users have posted on the list in response to the bot. I can't find the others right now but here's one:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-December/012330.html
Just to be clear, the bot does not insult anyone and it does state the reason for the comment rather than some ambiguous "ur pkg is full of fail, lol" comment.
My issue is that I consider the launch premature and overzealous and I'm seeking reassurance that in the future ongoing discussions will be considered before action is taken.
Still because of that quickshot I'll change my previous expectation to vote.
Even a reassurance won't change that for this vote, probably for a future one but not for this.
Sorry but once a application is passed the applicant has directly to show a responsible behaviour, TU stands for Trusted User not Trolling User. This is not meant as a direct insult, don't misinterprete it.
Regardless of how it was meant, "Trolling User" was inappropriate imo. The intentions were good. It's the rashness that's the problem as far as I'm concerned. Realizing that it was a bad idea and that there are better ways to do things is enough.