20 Apr
2011
20 Apr
'11
1:10 p.m.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, talki walki <lolilolicon@gmail.com> wrote:
ruby-sqlite3: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3 sqlite3-ruby: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3-ruby
I don't think these two gems are the same one.
Sorry for double posting again... For the sake of completeness: I checked the AUR comments of ruby-sqlite3 and found this:
'sqlite3-ruby' is now an empty placeholder gem that depends on 'sqlite3'.
Nevertheless, I still believe a gem named `foo-ruby' can be completely different from a gem named `foo'. The convention should not make an exception just for gems with a -ruby suffix.