On 26/09/10 01:53, Loui Chang wrote:
On Mon 20 Sep 2010 11:16 +0200, Simon Legner wrote:
do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph [1]? The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three different users. The correctest one according to the specified dependencies IMHO is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has the minimal code for building the package. What do you think?
I would think the the most correct one should be renamed to ocaml-ocamlgraph, and the rest deleted. You guys can sort that out and report back. Cheers.
ocamlgraph[1] has been orphaned, so I suggest first of all to remove it. Then we'll work out which of the other two to keep. /M [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21687 -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe