On Sun 16 Jul 2023 at 15:37, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> I have experience with packaging (debian, for work) but not on arch, but
> it’s shell and that thing I can handle :)
Why not show this by maintaining some air packages?
Mostly because there is nothing in aur that I use that lacks a maintainer. But I do have a software that is not packaged yet that I can port to aur.
> This is not gpg signed and I’m sorry for that, but gian and Antonio can
> also vouch for me as the validity of this email.
Why is it not signed?
Because I don’t have a gpg key, and when the dkim features on the email already are enough to validate that the email I send is from me.
I think you should read https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trusted_Users and
re-submit a signed application showing the minimum requirements are met.
I have read the wiki and I have applied to a packager position following the wiki rules or explaining why I didn’t follow a part of it, i won’t re-apply because that’s a waste of everyone’s time just for the sake of ticking boxes.
Summary:
- [x] known on the opensource community with multiple, and used, programs
- [x] packaging experience
- [ ] aur / arch package experience
- [x] contributes directly to upstream
- [ ] signed the mail with gpg
Best,
Tomaz
--
Jonathan Steel