Guys, When I saw this discussion about sage-mathematics I was just wondering what is customary when a TU wants to adopt packages that are not his and are maintained by someone in the AUR. I had a couple of those (remmina-plugins and freerdp) and from one day to another my packages were 'gone' from AUR. Only after that some TU sent me a message that he had taken my packages. There was nothing in the AUR ML about moving it. Is this how this is usually done? I know developers aren't great communicators, but it sure struck me as impolite, rude even. Thanks B On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:17:36 -0400 aur-general-request@archlinux.org wrote:
Send aur-general mailing list submissions to aur-general@archlinux.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to aur-general-request@archlinux.org
You can reach the person managing the list at aur-general-owner@archlinux.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of aur-general digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Delete request (Laurent Carlier) 2. Re: python packages in [community-testing] (Angel Vel?squez) 3. Re: Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community]. (Xyne) 4. Re: Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community]. (Sven-Hendrik Haase) 5. Re: Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community]. (Loui Chang) 6. Re: python packages in [community-testing] (Stefan Husmann) 7. Re: Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community]. (Stefan Husmann) 8. Re: Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community]. (Peter Lewis)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:57:49 +0200 From: Laurent Carlier <lordheavym@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Delete request To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository \(AUR\)" <aur-general@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <201008140057.49246.lordheavym@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Le samedi 14 ao?t 2010 00:50:06, Simon Stoakley a ?crit :
Hi, can you please delete firefox-tabcandy as it's now landed on trunk so can be got with the FF-nightly pkg Thanks Simon
Done :-)
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:16:30 -0300 From: Angel Vel?squez <angvp@archlinux.com.ve> Subject: Re: [aur-general] python packages in [community-testing] To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <AANLkTikXu=d2s8b46eaA_u2hHOE5Bkz9XXqnA_298QhO@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
python-configobj - put in testing for arch=any conversion back in March...
Moved
python-scipy - this is screwy... ?the version in [community-testing] has the same pkgrel-pkgver as that in [community] but they are different packages.
Fixed and moved
Can these be moved/fixed.
Thanks, Allan