But several users stating there is a new version in stable and an Mail about it should get the maintainer in question start to think about it. Maybe it was just the cache especially if he's checking regular for new versions. As I wrote in the forum I have no problem with giving the package back. 2010/2/11 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
On 11 February 2010 05:16, Chris Giles <chris.g.27@gmail.com> wrote:
Thus far, I've provided two responses in a forum thread<http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=90779>. Based on certain factors, I'm not happy about losing this package and I want to reclaim its ownership.
I guess that it was caused by web browser cache. Next time try reloading page several times (or in Firefox use Ctrl + F5).
Anyway there are some users which flag package out of date for no reason (it happened to me that someone flagged my package but no new version was out, it happened especially with svn packages) so I can understand original maintainer unflagged it if he didn't saw new version.
Lukas