Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

On 2014-05-01 18:56 +0200 Sam S. wrote:

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Arnold wrote:

...

There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package:

copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/

[...] I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I wouldn't pick one over the other right now.

A year later, it's now clear that "copy-agent" is the package that should be kept, since... - it works - it is well maintained (updates appear shortly after upstream releases) - it even installs systemd units and browser plugins

The "copy" package should be deleted, as... - it is broken - it has been flagged out-of-date for 10 months now with not reaction from the maintainer - it is badly named

Can one of TUs please take care of this? Thanks!

done, thanks