On Mon 14 Mar 2011 05:08 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:59:38 +0800 schrieb Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org>:
On 14 March 2011 10:32, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
Could the reason be some syntax errors? There are a lot of quotation marks too much. And the settings of your quotation marks seem to be quite inconsistent.
It would be funny if the AUR rejected PKGBUILDs due to syntax "errors" or inconsistency [1], especially this one where curly braces and double quotes merely dictate whether the build succeeds - not whether it is a valid PKGBUILD.
PKGBUILDs shouldn't be rejected due to syntax errors, but you never know, anything can happen.
Submitting PKGBUILDs to the AUR isn't exactly a magical happenstance. If you look at the code you will discover that are certain things that happen, and certain things that don't. I realise you're trying to help, but let's please avoid sending people on wild goose hunts. Thanks.