On 2015-02-06 12:30, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
No client will help, because the mailing list erases the original Reply-To header, so it's impossible for the MUA to determine it.
Some people, e.g. I, even don't set up a Reply-To.
That's the from the list's headers of your mail:
"Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:14:59 -0300
From: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo@barrera.io>
To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general@archlinux.org>
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR orphaning/deletion/merging method
Reply-To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository \(AUR\)" <aur-general@archlinux.org>
Sender: "aur-general" <aur-general-bounces@archlinux.org>"
If I push Claws' "Sender" button, the mail only would be send to Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo@barrera.io>. If I use Claws' "Reply" button, the mail only is send to AUR general.
If I push Evolution's group reply button, the mail is only send to the list. If I push Evolution's reply button, Evolution asks me, if I want to reply to you or to Arch general.
Evolution can try to *guess* where to send the reply, but the reply address that the author may have included has been purged forever and is irrecoverable by your MUA. Since there's already a Reply-to-all button, I continue to see the purpose of dangerously mungling the user's emails. It's a huge privacy hole.
In addition, both MUAs allow to reply to all.
So I at least have got two MUAs installed that are able to handle this "issue".
Regards, Ralf
-- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?