Hi All, I had a feeling this matter would balloon out of proportion, so I took a screenshot of the comments <http://i.imgur.com/nA5cK.png> before they were deleted. After these, the next two were supplied by Alexander (xyproto) before he wiped them all. The first of these seems to be a bit petulant in my opinion. It looks like he became a bit peeved and intimidated when I mentioned being qualified. Alexander's (xyproto) first:
Your "well and truly qualified" statement is meaningless, unless you are aware of the qualifications of the people you talk to here, which I assume you are not. It's also offtopic.
Fine.
Alexander's (xyproto) second:
Removing all the comments, as they don't really add anything to the information about the package.
@ keenerd I didn't ignore your comment; I responded to it within a day. You then ignored my comment! You should get your facts straight before accusing. By the way, thanks for attempting to pick faults with eight of my PKGBUILDs overnight. Forgive me for thinking that you've got even more spare time on your hands than Alexander does. Also, where does it say on the ArchWiki that small Bash scripts must be housed outside of the tarball? You've made this change to my popular-packages<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/>PKGBUILD without noting where it states that doing so is mandatory. I also don't think this should have happened because Alexander (xyproto) himself wrote in the comments linked above that I didn't actually have to make that change! @ Dave & Xyne I appreciate your balanced comments. It's good that you haven't taken one side of the story and discarded the other. I just want to note - for the billionth time - that I didn't disregard official guidelines in the PKGBUILD. A full explanation of this is available in the aforementioned comments log. @ Alexander (xyproto) It's pretty obvious to all but the bleakest of minds that you deleted the first round of comments because I defeated all of your arguments and made you look silly. There's no way you'll ever admit to this, which is why you simply deemed the comments irrelevant instead. Also, you have carefully dodged the matter of the second round of comment deletions. You've only elaborated about your decision to delete the first round, which wasn't what I was complaining about in the first place! My issue was that someone then deleted my next comment, which was the only one listed there at the time: "As I'm the author of this little script, I will always want it to remain in the AUR". It will be interesting to see whether you have the balls to admit to deleting this isolated comment as well. The next step would be for you to formulate a semi-plausible reason for doing so in an attempt to trick anyone reading this thread. -- Regards, Xavion.