Re: [aur-general] Unsupported architectures in the AUR

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:58 PM, LoneVVolf wrote:

Martti,

the problem is not assembly in the source code, , but the fact that all compilers deliver machine-specific code . compile a C program on an arm processor, try to run the binary on a x86 processor. It will fail always.

I am perfectly aware. I'm sure I was addressing the general case of *using* architecture-specific code in the source state, which is where a PKGBUILD would start off where that would be an issue. Thanks however for clarifying this again.