Hi, On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 5:42 PM Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
Do you think anyone wants to risk screwing up their system after reading this first pinned comment[1]? I mostly use official PKGBUILD files if I ever want something new which is not available in the official repo. In my opinion, the method used in this AUR is supposed to be the official way of packaging llvm rather than splitting it into three PKGBUILDs. I'm not saying having three PKGBUILD files is wrong, there must be a good reason for having three PKGBUILD for llvm which I dont understand. All I'm saying is the current packaging of llvm is not helping to bring latest llvm quickly to the end user, we cannot use the current official PKGBUILD for llvm/llvm-libs to update to 16.x [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-git#comment-822090 Thanks, Mohan R