On Monday, December 23, 2013 00:10:40 Doug Newgard wrote:
**DELETE**
Duplicate of mono-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-latest/
Renamed upstream to budgie, submitter/maintainer renamed package without requesting merging/removal. Nothing useful to merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/music-player-git/
Maintainer said in the comments that the package is obsolete and needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-themes-git/
Fix was implemented upstream, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen-bin-fix/
Merged into kernel source tree as of 3.8: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8723ae-w110er/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8723e-w110er/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rtl8723e/
Out of date duplicate of sphinx, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sphinx-release/
Duplicate of volatility-svn, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/volatility-linux-svn/
Patch merged upstream, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zbar-v4l/
Duplicates of libpng and lib32-libpng. The submitter claims that they aren't because it will stay at 1.6, but they're still duplicates : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libpng16/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libpng16/
Duplicate of tor in community: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tor-stable/
Duplicate of tor-unstable: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tor-rc/
**MERGE**
Maintainer renamed package but never requested merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono3/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-beta/
Maintainer renamed package to comply with python naming standards, needs merged: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pytorctl-git/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pytorctl-git/
**OpenSync**
The opensync packages are kind of a mess. To start with, the tool was renamed and needs merged: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool-svn/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osynctool-svn/ Then we have an unstable, development release in [community] as libopensync that complicates things. I'm thinking the best way to handle this is to make the development releases the normal packages and the older, stable release suffixed with -stable. With this in mind, libopensync-unstable is a duplicate of the [community] package and needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libopensync-unstable/ And the other unstable package needs merged along with the regular one, taking into account the rename. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool-unstable/ && https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osynctool/ I haven't looked at the plugins yet. OpenSync is mostly dead, anyway.
Thanks Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
All taken care of, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan