On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Sébastien Luttringer <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
On 04/08/2014 17:39, Ido Rosen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Sébastien Luttringer <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
On 23/07/2014 23:35, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 23/07/2014 15:59, Ido Rosen wrote: That's fair, thank you for packaging lldpd! I noticed RedHat no longer seems to package ladvd, and has switched to lldpad. Maybe we should package lldpad (aka Open-LLDP) from http://www.open-lldp.org/ ? Thoughts?
Background: - Last release one year ago (not so RERO) - Last commit un May 2014 (good) - The software is not in AUR. (nobody seems to have interest)
I get all LLDP info (even proprietary protocols) with lldpd and the soft is well maintained. Although I would be happy to see him in community, I do not feel the need to maintain both. Do you see a technical reason to get both?
Well put. I see no technical reason other than RHEL compatibility, which isn't enough on its own. Lldpd is working great, btw. :)
Regards,
-- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A