5 Dec
2010
5 Dec
'10
4:57 a.m.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Christopher Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com> wrote:
Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> writes:
2) no commits in community since the addition.
3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from the "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because of that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting.
If he had ever been active, I would probably vote against the proposal. I hate to see this sort of thing. Unfortunately, Ranguvar has been AWOL since he was elected. Removal seems appropriate.
Ranguvar, you have my best wishes.
-- Chris
I also vote for removal. "Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology."