8 Oct
2018
8 Oct
'18
7:57 a.m.
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:43:28 +0700 Tom Hale <tom@hale.ee> wrote:
On 8/10/18 1:35 pm, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
namcap's output is informational, nothing more. Taking it as gospel or using it as any kind of automated checking instead of actually reading the output is not sane.
For greater specificity, the informational output can be split into:
* Information (-i) * Warnings * Errors
Unless they are badly named, are there any cases in which an error is not an error?
And if so, that rule could be excluded with --rules=, again making the exit code useful.
Every single error can be a false positive.