9 Dec
2010
9 Dec
'10
12:42 a.m.
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 16:23 +0100, Xyne wrote:
I think the passage concerning "similar" proposals is too vague. There is no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all cases and trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic spiral.
I trust the human factor to handle those cases. People will be able to determine whether it's the same proposal or not.
I've removed that passage, changed "bylaws" to "by-laws", and changed "YES / NO" to "YES or NO".
I would prefer the non hyphenated spelling. *shrug*
As Loui pointed out, we should agree on a final version soon. I currently support this version:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124479
Yeah we're starting to lump too many changes into one amendment.