Hi, I can't find anything in the AUR guidelines article about recommended naming convention for packages. Apart, from the brief paragraph here https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_naming I stumbled upon two packages that make me wonder about that: 1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gist-git/ installs straight from repo and, by convention, uses -git suffix 2) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-jist/ installs from Ruby gem Am I right the latter should be named just jist and jist-git for version of the package installing form git? Or, is the ruby- prefix recommended here? Or, the former should be actually named ruby-gist-git? There is another one, same kind of tool but implemented in Python: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pygist-git/ What, if any, is the naming policy in such cases? I sense, it those packages should be named after software they provide: https://github.com/defunkt/gist -> gist and gist-git https://github.com/ConradIrwin/jist -> jist and jist-git https://github.com/mattikus/pygist -> pygist and pygist-git Their implementation language is displayed in dependencies. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net