Aaron... you said you wanted people to host their own binary repos for little used packages in the very first emails about this subject several weeks ago. You have nothing since then to refute this.

I am merely agreeing and was preparing to do exactly that. Daenyth helped me to do this after a TU irc channel discussion about your wishes in this area. People remembered them and everyone agreed that it was my decision to remove something as EVERY TU currently has that right and we have never voted otherwise.

Also logically having PKGBUILDs in two places or even binaries in two places makes no sense for either Arch or myself because of support any "syncing" issues with pacman and in consideration of other long standing issues with plagarism.

I am concerned that neither you nor Allan could have waited for a simple explanation.

Bob F.

P.S... I already resigned.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> I feel removed of packages completely from the AUR violates Trusted User
> status. We stopped users doing this specifically because we did not want
> this to happen. I will be starting a removal thread.

I couldn't agree more. CVS history should still have the packages though, right?