On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi,
Please remove a number of unused versioned packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-0.14.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-io-0.14.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-coderay-1.0.5/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-equalizer-0.0.7/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-github_api-0.10.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-gssapi-1.0.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-httpi-0.9.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mime-types-1.16/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-minitar-0.5.4/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mixlib-config-1.1.2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-moneta-0.6.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-multipart-post-1.2.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-net-ssh-multi-1.1.2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nori-1.0.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-puma-1.6.3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ridley-1.5.3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubyntlm-0.1.1/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-wasabi-1.0.0/
Incorrectly named packages that should be removed as well:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-digital-ocean/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-exception-notification/
All nuked.
Thanks. A few more that I missed
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-memoizable-0.2/
please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-sdl/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubysdl/
What's the rationale behind this change? ruby-sdl is perfectly fine, ruby-rubysdl is just silly imho.
The gemname is 'rubysdl' http://rubygems.org/gems/rubysdl, the package name should be 'ruby-$gemname'. The question should go to upstream developers - why do they use "ruby" prefix in their gem names if the gems are for ruby only anyway.
Well, sometimes upstream is wrong, it does not mean we should follow them blindly. It is redundant if used on rubygems.org indeed, and it is that much more if we add another 'ruby-' on top of it. 'ruby-$gemname' is a guideline, not an absolute rule, there's no point applying it if your brain tells you it makes a redundant and silly package name. I'll be deleting 'ruby-rubysdl', you should keep 'ruby-sdl'. BTW, speaking about $gemname, that variable is useless in most ruby packages, just use ${pkgname#*-}, the less variables, the better. Cheers, -- Maxime