On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:20 PM, jesse jaara <jesse.jaara@gmail.com> wrote:
Upsated some might find the implementation in AUR more appealing than the one in repo. The is nothing that prevents people from uploading stuff to AUR just cuz it has same features as the repo package. No, us. AUR is not a space where everybody can do what they wants. There is rules, TUs and community are here to keep it as clean as possible.
Like example there are/were many -pulse packases in aur that simply add pulse support to the repo package.
This is not the point. I needs cairo-xcb which enable xcb support in cairo (from repo) to use awesome. Those cases seems to have sense to be in AUR. I don't see from what this package is different from extra one. If it's a duplication, there is no need to maintain it twice. That's my point. Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net