On 9 August 2013 19:29, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
... * remove distinction between "active" and "inactive" TUs
So now what happens when so-called active or inactive TUs do not vote and prevent quorum from being established? No action is taken? I see these changes cover disappearing TUs, but not non-participating TUs. I may also just be missing something.
... * various changes to correct or improve English throughout the document
While you're at it:
... mailing list] (aur-general). The proposal must also be worded unambiguously, and such that a YES or NO answer may be given.
-and such that +such that
... 2. quorum was established and the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to the number of YES votes
-quorum was established +quorum has been established
... +Quorums were established to ensure that all matters decided by vote are +representative of the TU group. All TUs are expected to participate in all
The terms "quorum" and "established" are already used in the document with a different meaning, so different wording could be used here, e.g.: +Quorums ensure that matters decided by vote are +representative of the voters as a group. All TUs are expected to participate in all
+A motion must be made by at least two TUs for the removal of a +TU. The motion must be sent to
-removal of a +removal of another
https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general], and contain a detailed and valid reason that the TU in question should be removed.
-that the +why the
+OR who has not voted in a consecutive series of voting periods, the starting
How many "consecutive series"?
+is followed by a discussion period of three days, a quorum of 66%, and a voting
-three days +3 days -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1