Hi, Bartłomiej Piotrowski proposed packaging standard changes: if there are 2 versions of some package foobar, then older version (1.0 for example) must be named as foobar1-1.0 and newer version (2.0 for example) must be named as foobar-2.0. I did not see such rule yet on https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_naming page, but my package openjpeg2 was silently removed with this reason however there are gtk* and wxgtk* packages that also violate this rule. I insist on giving me proof-link for this rule, including this rule into wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_naming) and renaming all packages according this rule. Or just leave it as is and stop dropping my packages. For more info see: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38016