I maintain qastools and I do not totally agree to this merge. Qasmixer can be built singularly from the qastools source using the -DBUILD_LIST=qasmixer cmake flag (see attachment). Also not always merging comments is a good idea, in this case they make no sense and may be misunderstood referring to qastools. If you agree, I'll re-upload the attached build script to the AUR so a comments reversion can be operated (qastools -> qasmixer). Next time it would be better wait for some other opinions when the packages to be merged do not share the same maintainer. Cheers On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:01:07 +0200 Massimiliano Torromeo <massimiliano.torromeo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Spyros Stathopoulos <foucault.online@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone! The package I was maintaining "qasmixer" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48676) has been superseded by a collection of tools that include the one I was maintaining (qastools https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54793). Therefore I would like to ask for qasmixer to be removed since the standalone sources for qasmixer have been removed from upstream.
Thanks! Spyros
qasmixer has been merged into qastools.
Thanks