Hi all, I'd like to hear your opinion on the naming of the AUR packages [1] of the QTScrobbler application [2]. The oldest package is "qtscrob" referring to the URL of the sourceforge page and the source code archive name. Although the name of the application stated on the homepage is "QTScrobbler". When I wanted to install the application in March 2010, I searched for "qtscrobbler" on AUR and obviously didn't find the package "qtscrob". Therefore I packaged myself and submitted the packages "qtscrobbler" and "qtscrobbler-cli". When I noticed the duplication I wrote a removal request to the mailing list [3], which was forgotten after a short discussion. (I submitted "qtscrob-cli" as a copy of "qtscrobbler-cli" for conformance having the removal of qtscrobbler* in mind.) The current situation is of course dissatisfying. I'd like to know whether the application name should be preferred over the short name. I don't mind about the maintainership of the packages. Regards, Simon (simon04) [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=qtscrob&do_Search=Go [2] http://qtscrob.sourceforge.net/ [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/aur-general@archlinux.org/msg07211.html