On 9 December 2013 17:28, Nowaker <enwukaer@gmail.com> wrote:
In addition to this, if you don't want to maintain the from-source package
any more, please disown it so that someone who does can take over maintaining it.
This package was dropped from community to AUR 2 months ago, and nobody was interested in it for 1.5 months before I adopted it. So if I'm to reupload this package as openarena-bin, I don't see any reason to leave the old openarena as is. If anyone ever thinks it's reasonable to provide source-compiled openarena, they will just create a new package. The name will be free to take at any time. Does it sound good?
Thanks for your answers.
-- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Well the comments and the votes are for the source-built package, transferring those to a binary package seems wrong to me, but then again, I'm not a TU, so it's not up to me. Does the source package still build? If so, I see no problems leaving it as an orphan. Someone who uses it might pick up maintaining it. WorMzy