On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Smartboy <smartboyathome@gmail.com> wrote:> Just wondering, as a user, does this mean Pacman will now complain if one> builds and installs unsigned packages from the AUR? nope, pacman -U would work the same way.
Smartboy>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:>>> Hi all,>>>> as discussed all new packages have to be signed from now on. This mean>> that if you use a build server you have to download the package to>> create the signature. Also see>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Signing_Packages>>>> A new version of devtools will follow soon.>>>> Greetings,>>>> Pierre>>>> -->> Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com>>>
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Pierre Schmitz's message of 2011-11-01 15:40:53 +0100:
Hi all,
as discussed all new packages have to be signed from now on. This mean that if you use a build server you have to download the package to create the signature. Also see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Signing_Packages
A new version of devtools will follow soon.
Greetings,
Pierre
Did this go to the right list? Was it only meant for TUs? If neither, please elaborate.
Philipp
To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development> <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org>, "Discussion about the Arch User Repository> (AUR)" <aur-general@archlinux.org> -- Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> stop html mail | always bottom-post www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16 | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim. # vim:set textwidth=70: