Am 10.03.2012 13:03, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:45:12PM +0400, Anton Larionov wrote:
All packages that match "${NAME}-{bzr,cvs,darcs,git,hg,svn}" with similar $NAME. http://p.blicky.net/avj2n
You probably didn't know about aurdupes [1]. `aurdupes -V` even lists a few more... We just need someone to review these in detail now :)
Warning: I haven't tested any of these packages personally.
Thee following packages can be deleted: also in [extra] amd-ucode https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45587 evolution-ews https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51055 fprintd https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49844 also in [community] cdemu-daemon-fixed https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57115 (alias) elementary-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54882 haskell-bytestring-show https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53357 haskell-glib https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37479 turpial https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35119 emacsen emacs is developed using bazaar, not git. The emacs-bzr PKGBUILD includes some hints how to apply different configure options. So the following packages should be removed imho: emacs-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56636 emacs-gtk3-bzr https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53904 emacs-gtk3-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52340 VCS emacs-navi2ch-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36450 is developed in git. See homepage. Do not delete: bzr (VCS) * bzr-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14700 * bzr-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45894 these are "false positives" due to a package name, that makes aurdupes guess wrong. Maybe bzr-dev should be renamed to bzr-bzr. Sounds funny and stupid, but would be the correct name. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35365 Regards Stefan