Re: [aur-general] Upgrading a beta package?

I don't think there's any particular policy regarding which package versions should be provided by a *-beta package. That said, I agree with Martti Kuhne: a "beta if there is one" package makes much more sense than an "always beta" package. In other words, always keep the *-beta package as up to date as possible.

I agree. I maintain rubymine-eap and decided to keep it as up-to-date as possible after some time. No EAP version currently? Official release is provided. This allows the users to use the newest possible version of software and not to worry about switching between rubymine and rubymine-eap. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu