Re: [aur-general] changing the status of the maintainer field

Another thing that you guys probably don't care too much about is the fact that -Qi -ing a package that you have installed will not list the Maintainer for packages from AUR. I think that's another good place to be able to list at maintainer, even if the maintainer isn't a TU. Also, isn't there something kind of terrible about the fact that CVS/SVN, AUR web, and comments all track a bit of information separately and in different ways? Sorry if there are things I misunderstand here. -AT