24 Mar
2013
24 Mar
'13
12:10 p.m.
On 24 March 2013 04:42, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
If a TU has an objection that he cannot support publicly then something is very wrong. The application process should not be some mysterious black box of negative, baseless opinions. If a TU would rather keep an objection to himself than risk offending the candidate by expressing it then either the objection itself is without merit or the TU is more concerned about his own popularity than the quality of the distribution.
I completely agree with you. But as we have just seen, it doesn't always work like that. In such case, a black box which can tell you some of the reasons why people voted "No" is an improvement over knowing absolutely nothing.