On 4 February 2011 04:21, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:

...

* Add pyopencl to [community] (I will use a better name, something like python2-pyopencl)

On Thursday 03 February 2011 13:49:26 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: python2-opencl sounds better IMHO.

It's all good but one thing: there either needs to be a provision for pyopencl or inclusion of the upstream module name in the description, so that the package naming doesn't hamper searches and common knowledge (i.e people would know 'pyopencl' only). I see the same issue with pyqt. Didn't we already have some discussion about the module naming convention during the major python transition?