[aur-general] Disown request for ArchLinux package weechat-git
Hello, Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159 Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
On 08/19/12 01:36, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
Just a suggestion, don't break away from an original thread. -- Taylor Lookabaugh
19.08.2012 11:45, Taylor Lookabaugh пишет:
On 08/19/12 01:36, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
Just a suggestion, don't break away from an original thread.
Ok, thank you for advice. I will wait some time for answer of current weechat-git maintainer. Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
Op zondag 19 augustus 2012 11:36:08 schreef Dmitry Korzhevin:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
so i guess this is your first mail towards fastfret79 we'll wait for maximum 2 weeks for a response and then we can go over to disowning the package following the aur rules [1]. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_what_d... --Ike
Hello, Please, disown package weechat-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159 19.08.2012 12:03, Ike Devolder write:
Op zondag 19 augustus 2012 11:36:08 schreef Dmitry Korzhevin:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
so i guess this is your first mail towards fastfret79 we'll wait for maximum 2 weeks for a response and then we can go over to disowning the package following the aur rules [1].
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_what_d...
--Ike
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:05:32AM +0300, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
Hello,
Please, disown package weechat-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
19.08.2012 12:03, Ike Devolder write:
Op zondag 19 augustus 2012 11:36:08 schreef Dmitry Korzhevin:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
so i guess this is your first mail towards fastfret79 we'll wait for maximum 2 weeks for a response and then we can go over to disowning the package following the aur rules [1].
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_what_d...
--Ike
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin What is buggy about this package? I have been using it for a month now, and it have not had any problems with it. -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
11.09.2012 03:30, Daniel Wallace пишет:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:05:32AM +0300, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
Hello,
Please, disown package weechat-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
19.08.2012 12:03, Ike Devolder write:
Op zondag 19 augustus 2012 11:36:08 schreef Dmitry Korzhevin:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
so i guess this is your first mail towards fastfret79 we'll wait for maximum 2 weeks for a response and then we can go over to disowning the package following the aur rules [1].
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_what_d...
--Ike
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin What is buggy about this package? I have been using it for a month now, and it have not had any problems with it.
This package has various errors, just use namcap: weechat-git W: Referenced library 'libperl.so' is an uninstalled dependency weechat-git E: Dependency guile detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libguile.so.17'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/guile.so']) weechat-git E: Dependency curl detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libcurl.so.4'] needed in files ['usr/bin/weechat-curses']) weechat-git E: Dependency libgcrypt detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/irc.so', 'usr/bin/weechat-curses', 'usr/lib/weechat/plugins/script.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency aspell detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libaspell.so.15'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/aspell.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency lua detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/liblua.so.5.1'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/lua.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency tcl detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libtcl8.5.so'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/tcl.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency ruby detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libruby.so.1.9'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/ruby.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency python2 detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/python.so']) And this package has no maintainer, because current maintainer doesn't answer on e-mails. Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
Op dinsdag 11 september 2012 10:18:17 schreef Dmitry Korzhevin:
11.09.2012 03:30, Daniel Wallace пишет:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:05:32AM +0300, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
Hello,
Please, disown package weechat-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
19.08.2012 12:03, Ike Devolder write:
Op zondag 19 augustus 2012 11:36:08 schreef Dmitry Korzhevin:
Hello,
Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
so i guess this is your first mail towards fastfret79 we'll wait for maximum 2 weeks for a response and then we can go over to disowning the package following the aur rules [1].
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_wh at_do_I_do.3F --Ike
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
What is buggy about this package? I have been using it for a month now, and it have not had any problems with it.
This package has various errors, just use namcap:
weechat-git W: Referenced library 'libperl.so' is an uninstalled dependency weechat-git E: Dependency guile detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libguile.so.17'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/guile.so']) weechat-git E: Dependency curl detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libcurl.so.4'] needed in files ['usr/bin/weechat-curses']) weechat-git E: Dependency libgcrypt detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/irc.so', 'usr/bin/weechat-curses', 'usr/lib/weechat/plugins/script.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency aspell detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libaspell.so.15'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/aspell.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency lua detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/liblua.so.5.1'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/lua.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency tcl detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libtcl8.5.so'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/tcl.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency ruby detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libruby.so.1.9'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/ruby.so']) weechat-git W: Dependency python2 detected but optional (libraries ['usr/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0'] needed in files ['usr/lib/weechat/plugins/python.so'])
And this package has no maintainer, because current maintainer doesn't answer on e-mails.
Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin
disowned because maintainer does not reply thx --Ike
participants (4)
-
Daniel Wallace
-
Dmitry Korzhevin
-
Ike Devolder
-
Taylor Lookabaugh