Also, is it bad to name stuff like openoffice.org3? I mean, 3 is the latest, right? What happens when 4 comes out? Aren't versions already in the package... -AT On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

Andrea Scarpino wrote:

...

On 25/05/2009, Nick F0x wrote:

...

there are 2 PKGBUILD of one office suite - "OpenOffice.org russian build from infraresource". I mantain one of them openoffice.org3-infra-ru (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20967), second - openoffice-infra-ru (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10301) is orphaned. i think openoffice-infra-ru must be removed as duplicate.

Why you didn't adopt the openoffice-infra-ru package instead of added a new one?

IMHO you should adopt openoffice-infra-ru and update it with your pkgbuild, then I (or a TU) will remove openoffice3-infra-ru from AUR.

I was a bit trigger-happy and removed openoffice-infra-ru. :(

The files are still available at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openoffice-infra-ru/ though. So, if Nick F0x agrees, it can be re-uploaded and maintained by him.

On 25/05/2009, Nick F0x wrote:

first, i didnt add openoffice3-infra-ru, i just adopted it. ok, i agree with you, so pls remove openoffice3-infra-ru, and i will make openoffice-infra-ru Well, done.

Regards -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer