Le vendredi 18 novembre 2011 19:40:15, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :

Heiko Baums wrote:

...

Hi TUs,

may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]?

It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the latest upstream version is 0.7.3.

So it would be nice if it would be updated in [community], too.

Heiko

This has come up a bunch of times already. I can't update due to incompatible irrlicht versions. They need a version of irrlicht that is not released and I'm not going to package irrlicht straight from svn. I've bothered irrlicht about a release 3 times this year but obviously to no avail.

So sorry, the stk devs made a fairly stupid decision and I can't help it. I wont patch the hell out of stk either.

-- Sven-Hendrik

One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart package. ++

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:

On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier wrote:

...

One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart package.

That is for upstream to do, if they're so dependent on devel versions of software.

-- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

If you really want to have the latest supertuxkart... why not create a seperate package for 0.7.3 in the aur? irrlicht-svn already exists at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50818 so I don't know what the problem is.

Laurent Carlier wrote:

Le vendredi 18 novembre 2011 19:40:15, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :

...

Heiko Baums wrote:

...

Hi TUs,

may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]?

It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the latest upstream version is 0.7.3.

So it would be nice if it would be updated in [community], too.

Heiko

This has come up a bunch of times already. I can't update due to incompatible irrlicht versions. They need a version of irrlicht that is not released and I'm not going to package irrlicht straight from svn. I've bothered irrlicht about a release 3 times this year but obviously to no avail.

So sorry, the stk devs made a fairly stupid decision and I can't help it. I wont patch the hell out of stk either.

-- Sven-Hendrik

One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart package.

++

A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that. It would at least need to conflict. -- Sven-Hendrik

On 11/19/2011 06:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:

Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100 schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase :

...

A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that.

It would at least need to conflict. This is what upstream of supertuxkart has written: "note that at this time SuperTuxKart uses irrlicht trunk, so you may need to build and install irrlicht from their SVN. We hope irrlicht 1.8 will be released soon and then distributions can start including it in their repositories"

http://supertuxkart.sourceforge.net/Installation

And here is a thread in the forums of irrlicht upstream about that: http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37207&start=210

To the question "When is 1.8 due to get out ?" someone replied among others: "You can get the SVN right now, conveniently through Irrlicht Nightly Builds."

So maybe you should indeed still hold off updating both. I mean supertuxkart 0.7 works and there are -svn packages in AUR if someone needs them. I just didn't know about the dependency issues.

Heiko Alright then. In general, if an Arch package isn't updated, there usually is a good reason.

-- Sven-Hendrik

2011/11/19 Heiko Baums :

But it could have been that you have forgotten it in the meantime. ;-)

An unnecessary joke, when this was obviously not the case here. - Alexander