[aur-general] Request to remove caatinga-git - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[aur-general] Delete request

[aur-general] Request to remove caatinga-git

older
[aur-general] Signoff report for...

Leonidas Spyropoulos

1 May 2013 1 May '13

7:19 a.m.

Hi, I would like to request for the removal of caatinga-git [1] from the AUR since I uploaded a newer version of the newrly tagged release caatinga [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caatinga-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caatinga Thanks, Leonidas -- Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health. #include int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}

Show replies by date

Stefan Husmann

1 May 1 May

12:47 p.m.

Am Wed, 1 May 2013 08:19:58 +0100 schrieb Leonidas Spyropoulos :

Hi,

I would like to request for the removal of caatinga-git [1] from the AUR since I uploaded a newer version of the newrly tagged release caatinga [2].

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caatinga-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caatinga

Thanks, Leonidas

-- Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.

#include int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}

Hello, stable packages and packages built from VCS can easily coexist in AUR. Just orphan the git version if you do not want to maintain it. Just my tw cents. Best Regards Stefan

Leonidas Spyropoulos

6:52 p.m.

On 1 May 2013 13:47, "Stefan Husmann" wrote

Hello,

stable packages and packages built from VCS can easily coexist in AUR. Just orphan the git version if you do not want to maintain it.

Just my tw cents.

Best Regards Stefan

Hello Stefan, I agree with you, especially since the VCS version works just fine now. I'm only following the request of the developer. In any case I don't intend to drop from maintainer so please leave them being for now. Regards, Leonidas

Jy Yaworski

1:53 p.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

Hello: simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged as such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive to comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since 2013-03-01. Could this be orphaned so that another maintainer could pick it up? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/simon/

Lukas Jirkovsky

3 May 3 May

11:32 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

On 1 May 2013 14:53, Jy Yaworski wrote:

Hello:

simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged as such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive to comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since 2013-03-01. Could this be orphaned so that another maintainer could pick it up?

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/simon/

Did you email the maintainer directly? The common approach is to email maintainer, give him two weeks for response and then orphan the package.

Jy Yaworski

1:07 p.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

I have now emailed the maintainer directly, and will update this thread if they do not respond in two weeks' time. On 2013-05-03 07:32, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:

On 1 May 2013 14:53, Jy Yaworski wrote:

...
Hello:

simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged as such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive to comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since 2013-03-01. Could this be orphaned so that another maintainer could pick it up?

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/simon/

Did you email the maintainer directly? The common approach is to email maintainer, give him two weeks for response and then orphan the package.

Joseph Yaworski

22 May 22 May

2:37 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

No response, and the email appears to have bounced at the address. On Fri, 03 May 2013 09:07:55 -0400 Jy Yaworski wrote:

I have now emailed the maintainer directly, and will update this thread if they do not respond in two weeks' time.

On 2013-05-03 07:32, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:

...
On 1 May 2013 14:53, Jy Yaworski wrote:

...
Hello:

simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged as such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive to comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since 2013-03-01. Could this be orphaned so that another maintainer could pick it up?

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/simon/

Did you email the maintainer directly? The common approach is to email maintainer, give him two weeks for response and then orphan the package.

Jameson

6:51 p.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Joseph Yaworski wrote:

No response, and the email appears to have bounced at the address.

Yep. The maintainer has an @aur.archlinux.org address listed which is obviously bogus. Can we, please, go ahead with this request? Thanks, =-Jameson

Bartłomiej Piotrowski

6:58 p.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

On 2013-05-22 20:51, Jameson wrote:

Yep. The maintainer has an @aur.archlinux.org address listed which is obviously bogus. Can we, please, go ahead with this request?

Of course we can! Orphaned, thanks. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/

3992

Age (days ago)

4013

Last active (days ago)

Download

8 comments

7 participants

tags

participants (7)

Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Jameson
Joseph Yaworski
Jy Yaworski
Leonidas Spyropoulos
Lukas Jirkovsky
Stefan Husmann