[aur-general] Please remove duplicate "flight-of-the-amazon-queen"
Please remove the AUR duplicate package "flight-of-the-amazon-queen" which is technically inferior to "fotaq", a more modern package with the same content. -- Sven-Hendrik
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:23:30 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
Please remove the AUR duplicate package "flight-of-the-amazon-queen" which is technically inferior to "fotaq", a more modern package with the same content.
-- Sven-Hendrik
Done. The strange thing is that both packages had the same maintainer.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 06:22:28AM +0100, Xyne wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:23:30 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
Please remove the AUR duplicate package "flight-of-the-amazon-queen" which is technically inferior to "fotaq", a more modern package with the same content.
-- Sven-Hendrik
Done.
The strange thing is that both packages had the same maintainer.
There was a difference in the sound files in both packages, that's why I left them both in AUR. The difference was explained in the comments on the deleted package page. Jaroslav -- To whom the mornings are like nights, What must the midnights be! -- Emily Dickinson (on hacking?)
On 15.11.2009 08:48, Jaroslav Lichtblau wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 06:22:28AM +0100, Xyne wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:23:30 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
Please remove the AUR duplicate package "flight-of-the-amazon-queen" which is technically inferior to "fotaq", a more modern package with the same content.
-- Sven-Hendrik
Done.
The strange thing is that both packages had the same maintainer.
There was a difference in the sound files in both packages, that's why I left them both in AUR. The difference was explained in the comments on the deleted package page.
Jaroslav
Indeed, but there was no effective difference for users except that it was rather confusing to have both packages at the same time.
participants (3)
-
Jaroslav Lichtblau
-
Sven-Hendrik Haase
-
Xyne