By the looks of it both flashplugins are used by devs for testing their flash apps on older versions of flash. Neither are considered popular but both have a use so I vote that they should stay. As for the kernel26 packages I don't know how it worked in the past with kernel24 packages but I think a month after the movement of linux from testing to core seems a reasonable amount of time before deleting them. Ultimately it's up to the TU's though. Gadget3000 On 15 August 2011 15:52, Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com> wrote:

On 12.8.2011 19:12, Det wrote:

...

Hi all you electronic mail readers,

There was some talk some time ago I think concerning the removal of the Flash10.1 packages. I thought I'd bring it back up. Here are the links:

flashplugin-10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47029<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47029> lib32-flashplugin10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49982<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49982>

Then another thing is those kernel26- packages (all 59 of 'em). Is there some deadline until all the ones that hasn't been updated or converted into linux- alternatives should be removed?:

http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&**PP=100<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&PP=100>

Thanks, byyye Det

End of electronic guru mail.

This is a tricky one I know. What about just the Flash10.1 packages?