[aur-general] Disown request: debhelper
Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen updated in more than a year (http://joeyh.name/code/debhelper/) and doesn't build Thanks (Hope I'm using mailing lists correctly!)
While you're at it, can you disown devscripts too? ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devscripts/) Similar situation On 16 September 2013 19:24, Charles Pigott <charlespigott@googlemail.com>wrote:
Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen updated in more than a year (http://joeyh.name/code/debhelper/) and doesn't build
Thanks
(Hope I'm using mailing lists correctly!)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Charles Pigott <charlespigott@googlemail.com> wrote:
While you're at it, can you disown devscripts too? ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devscripts/) Similar situation
On 16 September 2013 19:24, Charles Pigott <charlespigott@googlemail.com>wrote:
Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen updated in more than a year (http://joeyh.name/code/debhelper/) and doesn't build
Is there an existing maintainer to these packages? Do they know you want this? cheers! mar77i
well, no, but both packages are broken and have (semi-)working patches posted in the comments which have been there for several months, with nothing done about them C On 17 September 2013 08:11, Martti Kühne <mysatyre@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Charles Pigott <charlespigott@googlemail.com> wrote:
While you're at it, can you disown devscripts too? ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devscripts/) Similar situation
On 16 September 2013 19:24, Charles Pigott <charlespigott@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen updated in more than a year (http://joeyh.name/code/debhelper/) and doesn't build
Is there an existing maintainer to these packages? Do they know you want this?
cheers! mar77i
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:51:40 Charles Pigott wrote:
well, no, but both packages are broken and have (semi-)working patches posted in the comments which have been there for several months, with nothing done about them
Given that the two maintainers of the requested packages are still quite active on AUR, I think you should at least try to get in touch with them, as the general disown rule is no response for two weeks after a personal e-mail sent. Regards, Felix Yan
very well, i shall try that On 17 September 2013 10:57, Felix Yan <felixonmars@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:51:40 Charles Pigott wrote:
well, no, but both packages are broken and have (semi-)working patches posted in the comments which have been there for several months, with nothing done about them
Given that the two maintainers of the requested packages are still quite active on AUR, I think you should at least try to get in touch with them, as the general disown rule is no response for two weeks after a personal e-mail sent.
Regards, Felix Yan
participants (3)
-
Charles Pigott
-
Felix Yan
-
Martti Kühne