[aur-general] Deletion request: mt-git
It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730 [2] https://github.com/mutantturkey/mt/
On 16/06/12 08:47 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730 [2] https://github.com/mutantturkey/mt/ Did you try to build it and run into an error that would require an active maintainer to fix? Because the comment just looks like a yaourt issue.
On 2012年06月17日 12:01, Connor Behan wrote:
On 16/06/12 08:47 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730 [2] https://github.com/mutantturkey/mt/ Did you try to build it and run into an error that would require an active maintainer to fix? Because the comment just looks like a yaourt issue.
Yes, I tried and it failed due to upstream problem. The log is available at http://paste.kde.org/501710 .
2012/6/17 Jekyll Wu <adaptee@gmail.com>:
On 2012年06月17日 12:01, Connor Behan wrote:
On 16/06/12 08:47 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730 [2] https://github.com/mutantturkey/mt/
Did you try to build it and run into an error that would require an active maintainer to fix? Because the comment just looks like a yaourt issue.
Yes, I tried and it failed due to upstream problem. The log is available at http://paste.kde.org/501710 .
Related to error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly.", you might want to take a look at this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29643 Rafael Ferreira
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:26 PM, rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I tried and it failed due to upstream problem. The log is available at http://paste.kde.org/501710 .
Related to error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly.", you might want to take a look at this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29643
Rafael Ferreira
Thanks for the information. It compiles OK after the simple substitution, but it encounters segment fault on startup.
On 2012年06月19日 16:23, 筱桉 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:26 PM, rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I tried and it failed due to upstream problem. The log is available at http://paste.kde.org/501710 .
Related to error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly.", you might want to take a look at this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29643
Rafael Ferreira
Thanks for the information. It compiles OK after the simple substitution, but it encounters segment fault on startup.
Ping? Could some TU please remove that package? * the upstream is dead * the AUR maintainer is not active * it encounters segment fault on startup(after applying a simple patch to make it compile) Regards Jekyll
Op zondag 1 juli 2012 14:28:51 schreef Jekyll Wu:
On 2012年06月19日 16:23, 筱桉 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:26 PM, rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I tried and it failed due to upstream problem. The log is available
at
Related to error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly.", you might want to take a look at this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29643
Rafael Ferreira
Thanks for the information. It compiles OK after the simple substitution, but it encounters segment fault on startup.
Ping? Could some TU please remove that package?
* the upstream is dead * the AUR maintainer is not active * it encounters segment fault on startup(after applying a simple patch to make it compile)
Regards Jekyll
gone, thx --Ike
participants (5)
-
Connor Behan
-
Ike Devolder
-
Jekyll Wu
-
rafael ff1
-
筱桉