[aur-general] Guidelines: cp, mkdir vs install
Hi, Looking to improve the quality of my packages, I read again the guidelines. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards However, it don't see anything about the install command like install -d $pkgdir/usr/{bin,share/man/man1,share/locale} Some contributors on AUR use cp or mkdir to install files/dir (when no makefile is provided) and others use install command. What's the opinion of TU on this point? Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org
On 29/12/11 19:56, François Boulogne wrote:
Hi,
Looking to improve the quality of my packages, I read again the guidelines. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
However, it don't see anything about the install command like install -d $pkgdir/usr/{bin,share/man/man1,share/locale}
Some contributors on AUR use cp or mkdir to install files/dir (when no makefile is provided) and others use install command.
What's the opinion of TU on this point?
Use install with -m specifying the correct permissions Allan
Le 29/12/2011 11:13, Allan McRae a écrit :
On 29/12/11 19:56, François Boulogne wrote:
Hi,
Looking to improve the quality of my packages, I read again the guidelines. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
However, it don't see anything about the install command like install -d $pkgdir/usr/{bin,share/man/man1,share/locale}
Some contributors on AUR use cp or mkdir to install files/dir (when no makefile is provided) and others use install command.
What's the opinion of TU on this point?
Use install with -m specifying the correct permissions
Thank you Allan -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org
participants (2)
-
Allan McRae
-
François Boulogne