[aur-general] Please delete aptana-studio
Hello, Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted. Thanks, Smartboy [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy <smartboyathome@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted.
Thanks, Smartboy
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD.
2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy <smartboyathome@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted.
Thanks, Smartboy
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD.
And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company.
On 10/24/2010 10:06 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský<l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy<smartboyathome@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted.
Thanks, Smartboy
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD. And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company. Then should Aptana be deleted? Seems confusing to me to have both Aptana and Aptana-Studio which do the same thing.
Smartboy
Am 24.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Smartboy:
On 10/24/2010 10:06 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský<l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy<smartboyathome@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted.
Thanks, Smartboy
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD. And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company. Then should Aptana be deleted? Seems confusing to me to have both Aptana and Aptana-Studio which do the same thing.
Smartboy
Yes, and done.
participants (4)
-
Lukáš Jirkovský
-
Ray Rashif
-
Smartboy
-
Stefan Husmann