2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkovsky@gmail.com:

On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy smartboyathome@gmail.com wrote:

...

Hello,

Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted.

Thanks, Smartboy

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634

Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD.

And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company.

Am 24.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Smartboy:

On 10/24/2010 10:06 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

...

2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovskýl.jirkovsky@gmail.com:

...

On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboysmartboyathome@gmail.com wrote:

...

Hello,

Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted.

Thanks, Smartboy

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634

Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD.

And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company.

Then should Aptana be deleted? Seems confusing to me to have both Aptana and Aptana-Studio which do the same thing.

Smartboy

Yes, and done.