[aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git
Hello, I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs. Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete vim-colors-solarized-git I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/ Thanks
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs.
Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete vim-colors-solarized-git
I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
Thanks
This still needs to be acted upon.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs.
Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete vim-colors-solarized-git
I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
Thanks
This still needs to be acted upon.
Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please? Jason
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs.
Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete vim-colors-solarized-git
I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
Thanks
This still needs to be acted upon.
Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please?
Jason
We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package and will still be maintained by him even after the merge. Regards, Felix Yan
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs.
Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete vim-colors-solarized-git
I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
Thanks
This still needs to be acted upon.
Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please?
Jason
We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package and will still be maintained by him even after the merge.
Regards, Felix Yan
xales is the new maintainer of both packages, and instead of updating vim-solarized-git, he created a new package (vim-colors-solarized-git). I think it's pretty clear which package xales prefers. Jason
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs.
Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete vim-colors-solarized-git
I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
Thanks
This still needs to be acted upon.
Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please?
Jason
We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package and will still be maintained by him even after the merge.
Regards, Felix Yan
xales is the new maintainer of both packages, and instead of updating vim-solarized-git, he created a new package (vim-colors-solarized-git). I think it's pretty clear which package xales prefers.
Jason
Merged, thx. -- Maxime
participants (3)
-
Felix Yan
-
Jason St. John
-
Maxime Gauduin