On 20.11.2011 10:20, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

On 11/19/2011 07:44 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find the time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less time because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left ends up going to Salt (http://saltstack.org).

So, very sadly, I need to resign from my position as an Arch Linux TU. I hope I can be of assistance to Arch in the future and I am still planning on maintaining the Varch project: https://github.com/thatch45/varch

So with deep regret, I must resign my brief stint as a TU, it was fun, and I greatly appreciate the opportunity, but it is very unfair of me to not be maintaining my packages.

Sad to see you leave already, but thanks for you work none the less. -- Florian Pritz

On 21 November 2011 00:10, Jelle van der Waa wrote:

On 19/11/11 19:44, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find the time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less time because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left ends up going to Salt (http://saltstack.org).

So, very sadly, I need to resign from my position as an Arch Linux TU. I hope I can be of assistance to Arch in the future and I am still planning on maintaining the Varch project: https://github.com/thatch45/varch

So with deep regret, I must resign my brief stint as a TU, it was fun, and I greatly appreciate the opportunity, but it is very unfair of me to not be maintaining my packages.

Thanks

-Thomas S Hatch

Sad to see you leave, good luck with Salt!

-- Jelle van der Waa

One awesome person less :( Good luck with everything else! -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:

...

...

On 19/11/11 19:44, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find the time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less

time

...

because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left ends up going to Salt (http://saltstack.org).

So, very sadly, I need to resign from my position as an Arch Linux TU. I hope I can be of assistance to Arch in the future and I am still

On 21 November 2011 00:10, Jelle van der Waa wrote: planning

...

...

on maintaining the Varch project: https://github.com/thatch45/varch

So with deep regret, I must resign my brief stint as a TU, it was fun, and I greatly appreciate the opportunity, but it is very unfair of me to not be maintaining my packages.

Thanks

-Thomas S Hatch

Sad to see you leave, good luck with Salt!

-- Jelle van der Waa

One awesome person less :(

Good luck with everything else!

-- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

Thanks everyone, maybe sometime in the future things will clear up enough for me to come back, but not at the rate things are going now. Life has changed so much since I joined Arch!

Keep making the worlds best Linux Distro better!

-Thomas S Hatch

Can somebody enlighten me what happened with this ML discussion? http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/thread.html shows a bit of a mess but it doesn't explain why [aur-general] TU Resignation Thomas S Hatch http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016543.html looks identical to the previous message: [aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available Thomas Bächler http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016540.html What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK). I'm not well-versed in the ML-foo so please rename this thread / start a new one if you think it's more appropriate.

On 22 November 2011 00:24, Karol Blazewicz wrote:

What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK).

Strange, I've never sent such email. In fact I don't recall I've seen any of these duplicate emails, only the original one from Thomas.

On 11/22/2011 10:57 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:

2011/11/22 Lukáš Jirkovský :

...

On 22 November 2011 00:24, Karol Blazewicz wrote:

...

What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK).

Strange, I've never sent such email. In fact I don't recall I've seen any of these duplicate emails, only the original one from Thomas.

Yup, my mailbox has only the e-mails you did sent, but when I went to the ML archives to bookmark some messages .. I got pretty confused :-)

we talk with that guy and he didn't do anything special. pretty sure his android device did something bad :) -- Ionuț