On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Loui Chang wrote:

On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:54:20PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Daenyth Blank wrote:

...

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 22:27, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Hi all,

As part of the TU meetings it was decided to post the proposal for restricting packages entering [community] here for discussion before voting.

My primary issue with the current proposal is that I feel 10 votes is slightly high for a first step. I'd *much* rather see 3-5 as a minimum, and I think others would as well.

89/97 packages with 0% usage on package stats have 5 votes or less. So this would achieve a net result of nothing.

How does that achieve a net result of nothing? If these rules were already in place it could have meant a net result of more than 500 less packages in community that we need to deal with.

He's saying that lowering the voting requirements to 5 votes will give us nothing because there are a lot of crap/unused packages with 5 votes.