[aur-general] deletion request: squeak, squeak-basicimage, squeak-fullimage
hi. squeak-basicimage and squeak-fullimage refer to old image of squeak image file. also the package do not build anymore because the sources are not there. squeak.org does not provide basic or full but just images for now. So would it makes sense to remove them ? I have transformed squeak package into squeak-vm (renamed it). So squeak package could be removed also. I have emailed drgeo maintainer of the changes to not break dependancy there if you delete squeak package as expected. I would like squeak users, if there is ones over here, to test squeak-vm and squeak-image, because I am not a squeak user. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3705 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3707 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3706
On 2010-12-05 20:15 +0100 (48:7) solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
hi. squeak-basicimage and squeak-fullimage refer to old image of squeak image file. also the package do not build anymore because the sources are not there. squeak.org does not provide basic or full but just images for now.
So would it makes sense to remove them ?
I have transformed squeak package into squeak-vm (renamed it). So squeak package could be removed also. I have emailed drgeo maintainer of the changes to not break dependancy there if you delete squeak package as expected.
I would like squeak users, if there is ones over here, to test squeak-vm and squeak-image, because I am not a squeak user.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3705 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3707 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3706
I've deleted those packages. In retrospect I realize that a message should have been left on the squeak page to inform users of the transition, but it should hopefully become clear when they search for squeak. Regards, Xyne
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 20:28 +0100, Xyne a écrit :
I've deleted those packages. In retrospect I realize that a message should have been left on the squeak page to inform users of the transition, but it should hopefully become clear when they search for squeak.
Did you deleted them ? I still see them on AUR now.
On 2010-12-05 21:26 +0100 (48:7) solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 20:28 +0100, Xyne a écrit :
I've deleted those packages. In retrospect I realize that a message should have been left on the squeak page to inform users of the transition, but it should hopefully become clear when they search for squeak.
Did you deleted them ? I still see them on AUR now.
I forgot to check the "confirm" box. :P They should be deleted now.
I meant delete squeak but keep squeak-vm you deleted squeak-vm and keep squeak
participants (2)
-
solsTiCe d'Hiver
-
Xyne